Monday, June 2, 2014

PHOTOGRAPHY VS. THE LAW


In 2010, Haitian photographer Daniel Morel’s rights were infringed upon when major companies such as NYTImes.com, Washington Post, ABC, CBS and various other media based organizations used images he took of the earthquake in Haiti without his permission for news broadcasting purposes. Hours after the Earthquake Morel updated his images of the damages on TwitPic, a website designed in connection to twitter for uploading and sharing images. Shortly after his post, a different user who claimed they were his, reposted his images. Preceding this post the Agence France Presse and Getty Images distributed the photos to various clients internationally. Days after this infringement, a Manhattan jury found that both companies had “willfully infringed upon Mr. Morel’s copyright of eight pictures he took of the 2010 Haiti earthquake and awarded him $1.22 million.” Not only had these companies infringed upon his copyright by using his images, but they had sold the images as prints as well. In retort to Morel’s lawsuit, Agence France Presse responded with the idea that the agency had not infringed upon his copyright and that instead he was interfering with its business practices. This response was overruled. Mickey Osterreicher, the general counsel to the National Press Photographer’s Association stated, “Like anything of value, people need to ask permission, give credit and pay fair compensation for those images, and when they don’t, photographers need to be able to stand up for their rights.”  Morel states when asked why he continued to demand his rights, even against such massive multi- billion dollar media industries “Someone had to fight for photographers.” Later Osterreicher added “This ruling is important because far too often we find that photographers don’t have the power to stand up to those that infringe with impunity. I hope that this sends a message, but in reality we need a cultural change so that once again photographs are valued.”